April 21, 2014

The Atlantic asks if 'white privilege' is responsible for ... blacks not following standard debate formats

It just keeps getting "better" and "better":

These days, an increasingly diverse group of participants has transformed debate competitions, mounting challenges to traditional form and content by incorporating personal experience, performance, and radical politics. These “alternative-style” debaters have achieved success, too, taking top honors at national collegiate tournaments over the past few years.

Well, if your judges share the same idiotic philosophy, of course you'll score well.

Two black women won a recent debate on whether the U.S. president’s war powers should be restricted; however, instead of actually addressing the topic, they changed it: "The more pressing issue, they argued, is how the U.S. government is at war with poor black communities."

Over four hours, the two teams engaged in a heated discussion of concepts like “nigga authenticity” and performed hip-hop and spoken-word poetry in the traditional timed format. At one point during Lee’s rebuttal, the clock ran out but he refused to yield the floor. “Fuck the time!” he yelled.

This year wasn't the first time this had happened. In the 2013 championship, two men from Emporia State University, Ryan Walsh and Elijah Smith, employed a similar style and became the first African-Americans to win two national debate tournaments. Many of their arguments, based on personal memoir and rap music, completely ignored the stated resolution, and instead asserted that the framework of collegiate debate has historically privileged straight, white, middle-class students.

Aaron Hardy, who coaches debate at Northwestern University, tells of instances where "... judges have been very angry, coaches have screamed and yelled. People have given profanity-laced tirades, thrown furniture, and both sides of the ideological divide have used racial slurs."

Truly unbelievable. I wonder how these folks would feel. What's even more unbelievable is that this actually has to be said in 2014: “I think it is wildly reductionist to say that black people can’t understand debate unless there is rap in it—it sells short their potential.”

Uh yeah, 'ya think?

Posted by Hube at April 21, 2014 08:44 PM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

Hube, thanks for sharing this. I think I was reading with my jaw somehow dropped and pseudo-smiling at the lunacy of it at the same time. These are amazing days...

Posted by: Douglas Ernst at April 22, 2014 07:57 AM

I felt the same way, Doug. I almost thought it was an Onion article.

Posted by: Hube at April 22, 2014 08:03 AM

It won't be too long till the movie Idiocracy is no longer fiction

Posted by: Arthur at April 22, 2014 11:51 AM

That's what I thought, too, at first... that it was some kind of Onion (or another satirical website) article.

Posted by: Carl at April 22, 2014 02:10 PM

The Colossus of Rhodey: The Atlantic asks if 'white privilege' is responsible for ... blacks not following standard debate formats
[url=http://www.gfw636zx78af26nk42t3qu9p967xq8t6s.org/]udjicvyfqjw[/url]
adjicvyfqjw
djicvyfqjw http://www.gfw636zx78af26nk42t3qu9p967xq8t6s.org/

Posted by: djicvyfqjw at February 13, 2017 07:07 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?