January 22, 2014

The "progressives'" ever-increasing penchant for outright make-believe

I would ask "Is it me?" but I know it's not. Becoming ever-more commonplace is "progressives'" predilection for outright invoking pure fantasy in place of actual fact. Months ago (and perhaps still) the most egregious example was Boss Obama's oft-repeated LIE that "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." You all (meaning, rational, clear-thinking folk) then saw how quickly the "progressive" minions took to media to defend -- defend -- this complete falsehood. It was hysterical ... and pathetically sad.

More recently, now-Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis (most "famous" for last year standing up against that state's proposed more restrictive abortion law) has been caught red-handedly LYING about her past, and her supposed "hardships." Among these are how she was a "struggling" single mom who picked herself up by her bra-straps and made it to Harvard Law School. Except ... the FACTS say otherwise. She essentially married a "sugar daddy" who paid for her schooling, and whom she promptly divorced as soon as she got her degree. And this ex got custody of their (and Davis' from a previous marriage) children child (the other child was already an adult).


"... and get your soon-to-be
ex-husband to pay for it!"

But does Davis acknowledge any of this? Aside from a very lame "my language could have been 'tighter,'" absolutely not. In fact, she's doubling down against people bringing this up, calling it a "personal attack" and bringing up the ridiculously tiresome "war on women." But worst of all, she blamed her opponent for much of the attacks, and stated that challenger Greg Abbott "hasnít walked a day in my shoes." Aside from the FACT that this implies that FALSE hardship Davis "experienced," it's insanely insulting since ... Abbott has been in a wheelchair for 30 years.

Good luck, sweetie.

Elsewhere in the Empire State, Gov. Andrew Cuomo is pulling a Davis-esque maneuver in blaming everyone else for his own stupidity. But mainly that dastardly New York Post because it called the gov out on his ridiculous lingo when he said that "extreme" conservatives (what conservative isn't, really, to a "progressive?") "have no place in the state of New York." To him personally, "extreme" apparently means "right-to-life (against abortion), pro-assault-weapon (believe in 2nd Amendment), [and] anti-gay (believe in traditional marriage)." I can give Andy some leeway on that last one as there surely are "extreme" rightists who detest gay Americans, and maybe that is indeed what he meant. But I doubt it, given the other two on his list. I mean, really -- "pro-assault weapon" is just silly. "Progressives" believe any gun is an "assault weapon." There are so many examples of these idiots getting the definition wrong you can't keep count. But worst of all -- being pro-life is "extreme??" So much so that you shouldn't step one foot in Andy's state?

Cuomo said this. Instead of issuing a statement saying something like "he didn't mean it as it came out," his office hits back with FALSEHOODS: that original NY Post article author "Fred Dicker is an extreme conservative." That "Fred Dicker(!!) has angered many with what has been reported as 'hateful' comments." That the gov meant "New York is a politically moderate state and an extremist agenda is not politically viable statewide." And most hilariously of all, a plea to "Let's discuss relevant issues rationally."

(Democrats and other "progressives" would like to remind you, also, at this time: "CHRIS CHRISTIE!!!")

I sure hope the GOP (and others) are taking notes and paying close attention. In fact, if I were running for office I'd openly mock these two lemons and others -- and the liberal press -- by making a statement, and then immediately claiming I didn't say what I said. And then I'd get angry at any reporter for claiming I did say what I said. And then I'd issue a press release clamoring for "civility" and "rational discussion."

Posted by Hube at January 22, 2014 11:10 AM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

If Wendy Davis were a conservative and Greg Abbott a liberal, she wouldn't have gotten away with mocking his paraplegia.It'd be all over the news and liberals would be wondering where civility has gone or something. What she said was disgusting. It's not surprising that she fabricated her background to make herself look better. She's following in the footsteps of Obama and Elizabeth Warren. I really hope Texans do not elect this repulsive creature as governor.

Cuomo is a moron, too. I would live in New York, and I don't blame anyone for wanting to get out of that progressive hellhole. I won't go to New York as long as he's in power there. It's ironic that he made the anti-conservative comments at a time when New York is putting out commercials asking businesses to come there. Come there for what? To be taxed out of business? That's why they leave New York to places like Florida or Texas.

Posted by: Carl at January 22, 2014 01:34 PM

I meant to say, "wouldn't" live in New York.

Posted by: Carl at January 22, 2014 01:35 PM

Sorry for the third comment, but I have more to add. My home state of Minnesota is slowly becoming a progressive hellhole like New York, with the much-larger conservative portion of the state having their voices drowned out by Twin Cities-based progressives and the college towns. They elected a governor with a history of mental illness and who has never worked a day in his life (Mark Dayton), a member of the Nation of Islam (Keith Ellison) and a so-called "comedian" who hasn't lived in MN for years. Companies that were founded here like Greyhound Bus and Honeywell have moved to different states (Texas and New Jersey, respectively) because of the outrageous taxes here.

Hell, at times my folks have explored the possibility of leaving Minnesota behind for somewhere else. I know I've thought about it, even I lack the money at the moment.

Posted by: Carl at January 22, 2014 06:11 PM

Yep Carl, the issue really is the media. If a Republican had done/said what Davis and Cuomo did, it'd be the biggest political donneybrook since, well, let's do a Chris Matthews re: Chris Christie and say "WATERGATE!!"

Posted by: Hube at January 23, 2014 08:52 AM

Indeed. It'd be all over the news for weeks if that were the case. The Chris Christie "scandal" is a diversion designed to deflect attention away from the real scandals, such as the botched Obamacare rollout and of course, the Davis/Cuomo controversies.

Posted by: Carl at January 23, 2014 01:34 PM

Wendy Davis is an angel, and Andrew Cuomo is a straight shooter who tells it like it is. That Conservatives have launched a kill-campaign against them is evidence that they are running scared.

Posted by: Progressive at January 27, 2014 09:59 AM

Either Progressive is [legitimately] mocking Davis and Cuomo, or he/she is really one lunk-headed individual. Thanks for the laughs at any rate!

Posted by: Hube at January 27, 2014 10:25 AM

LOL!!!! Thanks for the chuckle, Progressive! Now back to the Lost Kos or Democratic Underground where you belong.

Posted by: Carl at January 27, 2014 01:19 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?