January 13, 2014

The NY Times supports racial quotas in school discipline

This should come as little surprise, nor should the paper's lies:

For example, African-American students represent only 15 percent of public school students, but they make of 35 percent of students suspended once, 44 percent of those suspended more than once and 36 percent of those expelled. Statistical information does not in itself prove discrimination. But research has shown that black students do not engage in more serious or more frequent misbehavior than other students.

Just don't ask they Times about that research. Because it's nonsense. As a former Education Dept. lawyer rebuts:

The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Armstrong (1996) that there is no legal “presumption that people of all races commit all types of crimes” at the same rate, since that is “contradicted by” real world data. For example, blacks, who are only 13% of America’s population, commit nearly half of all murders — four times the general rate.

[As] Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has noted, black teenagers are 25 times as likely to get arrested in Chicago as whites, and the black homicide rate for teenagers is 10 times higher nationally than for whites.

Yet, incredibly, the Education Departments treats that false presumption as fact, and insists that there is no evidence of “more frequent” misbehavior by some groups, and that ”research suggests that the substantial racial disparities of the kind reflected in the CRDC data are not explained by more frequent or more serious misbehavior by students of color.”

And check out where the Times says that there are "two kinds of discrimination": "... and cases where policies — like mandatory suspension, expulsion or ticketing — are administered in a race-neutral manner but have a disproportionate and unjustified effect on students of a particular race." This is pure Orwellian nonsense at its finest. How is it "discrimination" when the policies are administered in a RACE-NEUTRAL MANNER?? How, and on what basis, is this "unjustified?"

As previously noted, two US Supreme Courts cases -- United States v. Armstrong and People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education -- have established that what the Dept. of Education plans on doing in our schools is clearly unconstitutional.

There's a lot more here.

RELATED: The Wilmington (DE) News Journal agrees with the Times ("The statistics are on [the Obama administration's] side. Minority students and students with disabilities suffer more and greater discipline for transgressions than white students do. It is happening across the country, but a handful of states standout. Unfortunately, Delaware is one of them."); however, they offer this common sense caveat:

The trouble with the Holder-Duncan order is that the federal data is incomplete and the policy offers schools little help in fixing the problem. We are afraid it will merely create another federal mandate to fill out more paperwork merely for the sake of filling an in-basket in Washington.

In addition, as we noted in our last post, the Journal recognizes the Catch-22 schools are in:

Only a few years ago, after the shootings at Columbine and again at Newtown, Conn., the public – and elected officials – demanded armed guards in schools and zero tolerance policies for transgressions. Now the complaint is that the guards are leading to more arrests and zero tolerance policies are mindless bureaucratic traps. The schools will be criticized no matter which way they turn.

Indeed. What this is, folks, is an edict for outright denial of reality. The feds are mandating that teachers and administrators live in the Land of Make Believe.

ALSO RELATED: Linda Chavez tears apart this nonsense.

Posted by Felix at January 13, 2014 04:55 PM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

The Colossus of Rhodey: The NY Times supports racial quotas in school discipline
[url=http://www.g7hjgkkmz72500m643hc68405kn1v9mys.org/]uxdvmolskv[/url]
axdvmolskv
xdvmolskv http://www.g7hjgkkmz72500m643hc68405kn1v9mys.org/

Posted by: xdvmolskv at February 14, 2017 08:48 AM

The Colossus of Rhodey: The NY Times supports racial quotas in school discipline

Posted by: Aluminum Slug at February 28, 2017 12:35 PM

It?? onerous to find knowledgeable people on this subject, but you sound like you recognize what you??e talking about! Thanks
air max 2015

Posted by: air max 2015 at February 28, 2017 03:00 PM

The Colossus of Rhodey: The NY Times supports racial quotas in school discipline

Posted by: Gasoline Forklift Suppliers at February 28, 2017 07:37 PM

The Colossus of Rhodey: The NY Times supports racial quotas in school discipline

Posted by: Lpg Forklifts at March 1, 2017 09:45 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?