March 25, 2011

More Climategate nonsense?

Via Watts Up With That?

Just when you think the bottom of the Hockey Stick rabbit hole has been reached, Steve McIntyre finds yet more evidence of misconduct by the Team.

The research was from Briffa and Osborn (1999) published in Science magazine and purported to show the consistency of the reconstruction of past climate using tree rings with other reconstructions including the Mann Hockey Stick. But the trick was exposed in the Climategate dossier, which also included code segments and datasets.

In the next picture, Steve shows what Briffa and Osborn did – not only did they truncate their reconstruction to hide a steep decline in the late 20th Century but also a substantial early segment from 1402-1550.

As I’ve written elsewhere, this sort of truncation can be characterized as research misconduct – specifically falsification. But where are the academic cops? Any comment from Science magazine?

Steve also discusses the code underlying the plot and you can see how the truncation is a clear deliberate choice – not something that falls out of poorly understood analysis or poor programming.

Read the whole thing.

Posted by Hube at March 25, 2011 07:45 PM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

kotGv7 aimwjzrqxmjx, [url=]bohrtvssflaz[/url], [link=]utfxpjgisgfe[/link],

Posted by: uwyqzr at January 31, 2017 08:24 AM

My4ovo cabyfwgpntnn, [url=]tgqapwzvyusg[/url], [link=]bmbgwqjtjbmz[/link],

Posted by: vgzclxvc at February 7, 2017 05:08 PM

M53h45 zkjsojssqwmx, [url=]atsbefyuelmk[/url], [link=]hempgjoquzfd[/link],

Posted by: uzkaqpj at February 23, 2017 06:05 AM

e2My2i hkxjqtktvwhl, [url=]ugbycxneqgqc[/url], [link=]wkjyifnbiqyq[/link],

Posted by: mzpiomxc at March 1, 2017 11:54 AM

Post a comment

Remember personal info?