February 26, 2010

Yet another diversity conundrum

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) has criticized NBC for its "lack of diversity":

Two members of the Judiciary panel - Reps. Shelia Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) and Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) - ripped into (Comcast Chairman Brian) Roberts and (NBC President Jeff) Zucker for what they saw as the lack of diversity in programming and in the executive ranks at either company.

"There is no diversity on the Sunday morning talk shows," Jackson-Lee told NBC's Zucker.

Armed with lists of board members for both companies, Waters asked Roberts why Comcast had only one woman and one black man on its board. She then asked Zucker why NBC didn't currently have any black programming on NBC. "Is there some assumption that black programming is not profitable?" she asked him.

Zucker said that diversity was one of his strategic goals and that the company was trying to do better.

Not only is the irony delicious because MSNBC's Keith Olbermann has been recently ripping the Tea Party movement as "undiverse" (and hence, "racist"), but here we have members of a racially-exclusive group chastising others for ... their own lack of diversity.


Posted by Hube at February 26, 2010 01:46 PM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

"There is no diversity on the Sunday morning talk shows,"

Especially funny considering that Lester Holt has been anchoring the weekend edition of NBC's Today Show for 7 years now. Perhaps he's too Bryant Gumbel to count as a black man?

Posted by: Jeff the Baptist at February 26, 2010 04:32 PM

Maybe they could hire NY Gov Paterson?

Posted by: BadIdeaGuy at February 26, 2010 04:42 PM

The CBC is about as diverse as the clients of the hood check booth at a Klan rally. The group refuses white members, even if they represent majority black districts. And they claim the moral authority to criticize others about diversity?

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at February 27, 2010 08:16 AM

The CBC is about as diverse as the clients of the hood check booth at a Klan rally.

LMAO!!!!! :-D

Posted by: Hube at February 27, 2010 08:18 AM

I've often wondered at the legitimacy of some groups that speak out against racism. Is pre-judging based on race bad, and of in of itself doesn't make scientific sense, yes. But how is it that the groups VERY NAME implies racism (like Congressional BLACK Caucus, or the National Advancement of COLORED PEOPLE) are able to expect to be taken for real?

Being white, I've often wondered if I applied at one of the few BLACK colleges if I could get swept in under affirmative action, and have a minority scholarship?!

Posted by: Ed at April 23, 2010 04:15 PM

correction, the NAACP stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

But ya, and entire country wide group dedicated for a specific group.

Posted by: Ed at April 23, 2010 04:18 PM

H3g1oS uskwhmnyqzet, [url=http://wtslponvceki.com/]wtslponvceki[/url], [link=http://kvmxplporjnu.com/]kvmxplporjnu[/link], http://xjczqgljzsyj.com/

Posted by: nrwdfdm at February 3, 2017 02:09 AM

9rAIBD grortjqtkxzy, [url=http://opogjfdpohjc.com/]opogjfdpohjc[/url], [link=http://sqnngalkqjmd.com/]sqnngalkqjmd[/link], http://xhgkotvlnbkx.com/

Posted by: iminqqrbv at February 27, 2017 10:25 AM

Post a comment

Remember personal info?