August 22, 2009

How Obama & Co. think we're stupid

Rich Lowry counts the reasons:

Stupid enough to think that a new $1 trillion health-care entitlement is just the thing to restore the country to fiscal health.

Stupid enough not to know that almost every entitlement known to man has cost more than originally estimated, with a congressional committee in 1967 underestimating by a factor of ten Medicare's cost by 1990.

Stupid enough not to realize that it is through budget trickery - the taxes begin immediately, the spending is put off for a few years - that the program in the House shows "only" a $239 billion deficit over the first ten years.

Stupid enough not to focus on how the gap between the House plan's revenue and spending steadily grows after the first ten years, making it a long-term budget buster.

Stupid enough to think increased preventive care will save the government money, just because Pres. Barack Obama constantly repeats it, despite all the independent studies to the contrary.

Stupid enough to believe that a program with no cost controls that can be discerned by the Congressional Budget Office will control costs.

Stupid enough not to worry that Obama's proposed superteam of technocrats operating outside normal political controls - the so-called Independent Medicare Advisory Council - will resort to rationing when costs continue to spiral upward.

Stupid enough to consider it wise to use several billion dollars in cuts from Medicare to create a new entitlement rather than to forestall Medicare's own looming insolvency, currently projected for 2017.

Stupid enough not to notice that the "public option" was explicitly designed by the Left as a stealthy path to single-payer, even as liberals continue to talk and write about its ultimate purpose openly.

Stupid enough to believe that we'll be able to keep our current health-care arrangements if we like them, even though the public option could throw tens of millions of people out of private insurance.

Stupid enough to trust the same people who came up with the public option as stealth single-payer to craft a co-op provision that isn't a stealth public option.

Stupid enough to credit Obama's assurances that the Democrats' reform isn't about government intervention in the health-care system when - even without the public option - it all-but-nationalizes health insurance.

Stupid enough not to see through Obama's sudden insistence on calling his plan "health-insurance reform" as empty poll-tested phrase-making.

Stupid enough to consider Obama's reform a good deal when its insurance regulations would increase premiums for most healthy people.

Stupid enough to think that the very real problem of people with pre-existing conditions locked out of the insurance market can't be alleviated short of a 1,000-page bill reordering the entire health-care system.

Stupid enough to buy Obama's cockamamie stories about unnecessary tonsillectomies and amputations - undertaken by greedy doctors to pad their profits - driving health-care costs.

Stupid enough to get gulled by rhetoric attacking special interests when almost all the special interests are backing Obama's plan for cowardly and self-interested reasons.

Stupid enough to consider new taxes on employment - imposed by the so-called employer mandate - a good idea during a weak economy with a 9.4 percent unemployment rate.

Stupid enough to condemn ordinary people angry and frightened enough to show up at town-hall meetings in every corner of the country as the product of an "astroturfing" conspiracy.

Stupid enough to blame nefarious Republicans for the faltering public support for an expensive, ungainly and contradictory health-care program passed out of four congressional committees on strict party-line votes.

Stupid enough to trust the good faith and public-spiritedness of an administration operating on Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's ram-it-through-now credo that a crisis should never go to waste.

There has been a chorus of those (locally, too) who've lambasted Obama healthcare critics as "liars" and "misleaders" and point to the [only] proposed [House] bill as "proof." Granted, some -- many -- critics have made the most of hyperbole for their own benefit. But in general, there is a LOT of skepticism about Obama and the Democrats' motives, mainly because they themselves have been caught in writing and on video saying one thing in the past, and another right now. Like Obama and some key Democrats saying (on tape) that they're supporters of a single-payer system, for one.

John Rosenberg details recently how supporters of Obamacare say that the bill does not allow for coverage for illegal immigrants. Politics Daily writes that

The House bill, H.R. 3200, excludes anyone who is not a legal resident of the United States from coverage of extended insurance provisions. Section 246 reads, “Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.”

But then why did Democrats vote down -- on party lines -- amendments that would have required verification of residency status before receiving any benefits? For instance,

Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.) offered an amendment in the markup that would have ensured the laws barring illegal aliens from legally signing up for Medicaid would also apply to the new government run healthcare system that Democrats are determined to construct.

The Dems shot that down. Why? Rosenberg has [much] more here.

Another example is abortion. Obama now insists that any new plan will not cover abortions. But the AP disagrees in a recent article, Democrat Rep. Zoe Lofgren (CA) stated that abortion coverage is and should be in the bill, and Obama himself said that "reproductive health services (ie, abortion) will be 'at the heart' of his health care plan."

Obama supporters and their allies in the MSM have gone out of their way to portray healthcare critics as "uninformed," "zealots," "racists" and even "Nazis." In actuality, however, most of them are just your average joes who're [rightly, in my opinion] deeply concerned about Obama and the Democrats' true intentions. And, again, Obama and his party have no one to blame but themselves for this concern.

Posted by Hube at August 22, 2009 05:46 PM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

I think the most telling argument against ObamaCare is that Congress will not participate in it. If it's good enough for us, it ought to be good enough for them.

Posted by: Frank at August 27, 2009 12:31 PM

On the same subject, you might also like this article at "Obama Thinks We're Stupid". Here's the link:

Posted by: John at January 10, 2010 12:16 AM