November 09, 2005

It had to happen, part 2

Eleanor Clift:

" ... frankly, if the country, according to the polls, believes by a margin of 55 percent that President Bush misled us into war, the next logical step is impeachment and I think you're going to hear that word come up and if the Democrats ever capture either house of Congress there are going to be serious proceedings against this administration."

"Believes." Belief = reality in the ever-increasingly nutty world of the moonbat Left.

Posted by Rhodey at November 9, 2005 05:14 PM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

That moonbat, lefty Eleanor Clift and her crazy islamofacist BELIEFS. We need to get back to our faith based war on terror. All of this talk about lies and impeachment just emboldens our enemy, Senator Clinton.

Posted by: Jason at November 9, 2005 05:39 PM

What the hell are you smoking, Jason?

In what reality is Eleanor Clift an Islamofascist???

Posted by: lyra at November 10, 2005 01:11 AM

I believe that was Jason's attempt at cutting wit. However, he has mixed his rhetoric and just sounds ignorant.

Wow, Rhodey et al., you've got your very own Troll now! You've arrived!

Posted by: Bronwen at November 10, 2005 08:15 AM

Are you saying you don't trust polls? She was simply citing what several of them have shown as of late.

Or are you saying that when a poll shows the American people "believe" something liberal, they're simply buying into lies -- while when they "believe" something conservative, that's reflective of their *actual* beliefs?

Posted by: dan at November 11, 2005 04:36 PM

Come on, dan. It isn't just the polls. It's Clift's leap to impeachment. And the polls can certainly be attributed to the WH's lame weak-kneed responses to the Dems constant harping about "lying" yada yada yada.

Although I kinda agree somewhat w/Clift -- impeachment could seem logical in that it doesn't mean Bush'd be convicted. It would just be a "trial." But the "grand jury" has to get enough decent evidence for the "trial." And I just don't believe it's there.

Posted by: Hube at November 11, 2005 07:17 PM

I wasn't responding to the leap to impeachment, because it didn't seem that's what Rhodey was getting at. The only editorial comment was about the word "believes." He seemed to take issue, therefore, with the polls. Maybe it was just an unclear post, but I was just responding to what he clearly wrote.

Posted by: dan at November 12, 2005 12:28 PM

But it was clear about the impeachment part, as well. Impeachment based on just "beliefs" is a dangerous precedent, don'tcha think?

Posted by: Hube at November 12, 2005 12:50 PM


Posted by: dan at November 12, 2005 02:08 PM

Post a comment

Remember personal info?