The NBA is instituting a dress code for its players:
Players will be required to wear business-casual attire when involved in team or league business. They can't wear visible chains, pendants or medallions over their clothes.
Jackson, who is black, said the NBA's new rule about jewelry targets young black males because chains are associated with hip-hop culture, and he said the league is afraid of becoming "too hip-hop." In protest, he wore four chains to the Pacers' exhibition game against San Antonio on Tuesday night.
"I feel like if they want us to dress a certain way, they should pay for our clothes," he said. "It's just tough, man, knowing that all of a sudden you have to have a dress code out of nowhere. I don't think that's still going to help the image of the league at all."
The only thing I find more ridiculous than Iverson's statement that the NBA should pay for his clothes is the fact that the NBA is issuing a dress code at all. I tend to agree that in most cases it isn't what you wear that's important, it's how you act. I work at a school that has a uniform dress code, and I hate it.
If they're going to institute a code of some kind, they should institute a code of conduct.
Posted by: Bronwen at October 21, 2005 07:13 PMI'm not sure about the dress code per se, but agree that some standard needs to be set.
I'm much more in agreement with Bronwen's comment about a code of conduct.
After all, a current situation really illustrates how out of control teh NBA is. When the NFL's Vikings organize a "pleasure cruise" and have sex in public with imported hookers, that is a scandal. Similar behavior by an NBA team would bot raise an eyebrow.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at October 21, 2005 09:50 PM