August 15, 2005

Oh, but it was on Bush's watch, yada yada yada ...

... unfortunately, something appears quite amiss with the "Able Danger" revelations that the 9/11 Commission apparently never heard about.

John Podhoretz neatly summaries them: “So was the [9/11 Commission] staff a) protecting the [9/11 hijacker Mohammed] Atta timeline or b) Jamie Gorelick or c) the Clinton administration or d) itself, because it got hold of the information relatively late and the staff was lazy?”

Was there an agenda that didn't sit well with some commissioners -- such as the Atta-Iraq connection?

Posted by Rhodey at August 15, 2005 09:43 AM | TrackBack

Comments  (We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

Post a comment

Remember personal info?